Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Johnson v. Aramark Facility Services, LLC
as 6:2026cv00414
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
Aramark Facility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Faust v. Johnson et al
as 1:2026cv06571
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Faust
Defendant:
KENNETH JOHNSON, RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC and RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gayton et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03556
Plaintiff:
Tammy Gayton, Adam Smith, Alex Morales and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kenneth Johnson, et al v. Georgia Department of Public Health
as 26-11204
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON and JACQUELYN JOHNSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Kenneth Johnson, et al v. Georgia Bureau of Investigations, et al
as 26-10703
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON and JACQUELYN JOHNSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA, LOWNDES COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Unknown:
SERVICE
Johnson et al v. May et al
as 1:2026cv01212
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson and Jacquelyn Johnson
Defendant:
Chief Leigh Martin May, Judge Sarah Elisabeth Geraghty and U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 2:2025cv00546
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Seekamp, Andrew v. Sweet, Heather et al
as 3:2025cv00963
Plaintiff:
Andrew Seekamp
Defendant:
Heather Sweet, Lt. Stollman and Kenneth Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. All Star Security Services, Inc.
as 8:2025cv03201
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
All Star Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
