Cases 1 - 10 of 58
JOHNSON v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Stateville Correctional Center et al
as 1:2023cv02157
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
Stateville Correctional Center, Lt Semicivick and Officer Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Doory et al
as 1:2022cv00588
Petitioner:
Thomas Isiah Davis
Respondent:
Timothy J. Doory, Steven Crowley, Thomas Ports and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan et al v. United States et al
as 5:2021cv01030
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Earnest Draper, Earnest Moncada and others
Respondent:
United States and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2021cv00013
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DETENTION TACTICAL TEAM OFFICERS and OFFICER J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY CENTRAL JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00889
Defendant:
SERGEANT TAYLOR, GUILFORD COUNTY CENTRAL JAIL, GUILFORD COUNTY CENTRAL JAIL TACTICAL TEAM and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. REGAL
as 1:2020cv01988
Respondent:
REGAL
Petitioner:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morgan et al v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2019cv00929
Petitioner:
Steven Glen Craddock, Jonathon Graham, Kenneth Johnson and others
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2019cv00834
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant:
MR. SMITH, JOHN DOE, MR. TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan et al v. United States The
as 5:2019cv00171
Respondent:
United States The
Petitioner:
Kenneth Johnson, David Brian Morgan, Danny Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
