Moore v. Lubbock County Detention Center, et al
Plaintiff: Stormy Moore
Defendant: Lubbock County Police Station, Jordan Keith Freeman and C. Lockerd
Respondent: Lubbock County Detention Center and Kelly Rowe
Case Number: 5:2023cv00290
Filed: December 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: James Wesley Hendrix
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2024 Filing 13 Public correspondence received from Stormy Moore. The clerk has not responded. (jdh)
January 11, 2024 Filing 12 Public correspondence received from Stormy Moore. The clerk has not responded. (jdh)
January 11, 2024 Filing 11 Request for Copy of filed Habeas Corpus 2241 by Stormy Moore. Courtesy copy of docket #9 mailed. (jdh)
January 11, 2024 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Thu Jan 11 11:25:47 CST 2024 (crt)
January 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt No. 2, is DENIED. The documents provided by Petitioner show that he had $154.80 in his inmate trust account as of November 11, 2023. Therefore, Petitioner is ORDERED to pay the $5.00 filing fee by February 1, 2024 (30 days). Petitioner's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 1/2/2024) (chmb)
January 2, 2024 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Electronic Order mailed to Petitioner. Tue Jan 2 13:02:55 CST 2024 (crt)
December 18, 2023 Filing 9 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Stormy Moore. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (krr)
December 15, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE filed by Stormy Moore. (jdh)
December 13, 2023 Filing 7 Notice and election regarding consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Stormy Moore. (jdh)
December 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF INTENT TO REDESIGNATE CASE: Plaintiff is advised that the Court intends to construe this civil-rights complaint as a pretrial petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241. However, damages are not recoverable in a habeas petition. Therefore, Plaintiff must respond to this order, indicating either his acceptance of or objection to the Court's intended construction of this case within 30 days. The Clerk shall mail Petitioner a Section 2241, form marked with this case number. Plaintiff's failure to respond to this order may result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. (CLERK NOTE: Clerk mailed a Section 2241 form to Plaintiff on this day.) (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 12/8/2023) (krr)
December 8, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Clerk mailed this Order, along with a Form 2241 Petition to Plaintiff. Fri Dec 8 14:09:54 CST 2023 (crt)
December 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER: Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process will be withheld until judicial screening is complete, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel may be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until an answer is filed or until further order, (4) no amendments or supplements may be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 12/7/2023) (chmb)
December 7, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Thu Dec 7 09:05:28 CST 2023 (crt)
December 4, 2023 Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (jdh)
December 4, 2023 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jdh)
December 4, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with Resident Account Summary Report filed by Stormy Moore (jdh)
December 4, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Stormy Moore. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jdh)
December 4, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3,4. Mon Dec 4 14:09:17 CST 2023 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Lubbock County Detention Center, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stormy Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lubbock County Police Station
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jordan Keith Freeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Lockerd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lubbock County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kelly Rowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?