Dudley et al v. Lopez et al
| Antonio Dudley, Carl Jones, Christian Ojeda, Daniel Huffman, Ernest Brown, Gerard Buentello, Paul Bennett, Paul Anthony Ojeda and Ricky Harrell |
| John Lopez, J. Back and Bobby Lumpkin |
| 5:2023cv00291 |
| December 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's civil-rights complaint is dismissed without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R. Cummings on 1/22/2024) (krr)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Dudley did not pay the $405 filing fee but filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (lFP). Dudley is ineligible to proceed IFP and his complaint must be dismissed. Dudley's IFP application is denied. (Doc.4). Dudley's complaint is dismissed without prejudice as barred by 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Dudley refiles this complaint, he must submit a complete complaint on the proper form and pay the $405 filing fee. The Court will enter judgment accordingly. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R. Cummings on 1/22/2024) (krr)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs' request for joinder and class certification, to the extent that they assert them here, are denied. The complaint of Antonio Dudley will continue in this Civil Action No. 5:23-CV-00291-C. All other named plaintiffs shall be terminated as parties to this action without prejudice to their rights to file their own individual complaints if they desire. In light of the court's ruling, Paul Bennett's motion to be removed as a named party to this case is DISMISSED as unnecessary. (ECF Document No. #5 ). He is no longer a named party to this action. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R. Cummings on 1/22/2024) (krr)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6,7,8. Mon Jan 22 10:09:59 CST 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to be removed from civil case filed by Paul Bennett. (jdh) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with only Antonio Dudley's Inmate Trust Fund Statements attached, filed by Antonio Dudley, Carl Jones, Christian Ojeda, Daniel Huffman, Ernest Brown, Gerard Buentello, Paul Bennett, Paul Anthony Ojeda, and Ricky Harrell. (krr) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Parties. (krr) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (krr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Antonio Dudley, Carl Jones, Christian Ojeda, Daniel Huffman, Ernest Brown, Gerard Buentello, Paul Bennett, Paul Anthony Ojeda, and Ricky Harrell. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (krr) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3. Mon Dec 4 14:50:13 CST 2023 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
