Sawyer v. Director TDCJ-CID
Defendant: Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Thomas Sawyer
Case Number: 7:2012cv00185
Filed: October 31, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Wichita Falls Office
County: Wichita
Presiding Judge: E. Scott Frost
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Order Accepting Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge re: 20 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Thomas Sawyer. Magistrate Judge E. Scott Frost no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 8/13/2013) (plp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sawyer v. Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas Sawyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?