Bolton v. Director TDCJ-CID

Bolton v. Director TDCJ-CID

Petitioner:	Luke Cassidy Bolton
Respondent:	Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number:	7:2014cv00004
Filed:	January 9, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Wichita Falls Office
County:	Wichita
Presiding Judge:	E. Scott Frost
Presiding Judge:	Reed C O'Connor
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 22, 2015	Filing 34 Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 33 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Luke Cassidy Bolton. The instant petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. Magistrate Judge Robert K Roach no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 12/22/2015) (plp)
September 1, 2015	Filing 22 ORDER ACCEPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON LIMITATIONS ISSUE: After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and of the objections thereto filed by Respondent, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court. Accordingly, Respondent's request for dismissal of this action as time-barred (ECF No. 13 ) is DENIED. Magistrate Judge Robert K Roach no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 9/1/2015) (plp)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 22, 2015

Filing 34 Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 33 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Luke Cassidy Bolton. The instant petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. Magistrate Judge Robert K Roach no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 12/22/2015) (plp)

September 1, 2015

Filing 22 ORDER ACCEPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON LIMITATIONS ISSUE: After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and of the objections thereto filed by Respondent, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court. Accordingly, Respondent's request for dismissal of this action as time-barred (ECF No. 13 ) is DENIED. Magistrate Judge Robert K Roach no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 9/1/2015) (plp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bolton v. Director TDCJ-CID
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Luke Cassidy Bolton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?