Burgess v. TDCJ
| Christopher Michael Burgess |
| TDCJ |
| 7:2021cv00092 |
| September 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
JUDGMENT: This action came on for consideration by the Court, and the Plaintiff having failed to comply with the Court's order, It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the complaint be, and it is hereby, DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 10/29/2021) (mmw)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: This action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for want of prosecution. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 10/29/2021) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5, 6. Fri Oct 29 16:09:18 CDT 2021 (crt) |
|
Filing 4
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Christopher Michael Burgess must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff Burgess must either pay the $402.00 filing and administrative fees or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's complaint must be submitted on the Courts prisoner civil rights form.. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 10/19/2021. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/28/2021) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. 2 1983s and 2 IFPs Tue Sep 28 10:15:20 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Mon Sep 27 07:59:30 CDT 2021 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mmw) |
| Filing 1 Untitled correspondence against TDCJ filed by Christopher Michael Burgess. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) Modified on 9/27/2021 (mmw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Burgess v. TDCJ | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher Michael Burgess | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TDCJ | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
