Alexander v. Lumpkin
Naversia Ce'Allen Alexander |
Bobby Lumpkin |
1:2022cv00002 |
January 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Rolando Olvera |
Ignacio Torteya |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 STATE COURT RECORDS by Bobby Lumpkin, filed. (Attachments: #1 1 DA01_Mem Opinion, #2 2 DA02_Judgment, #3 3 DA03_Mandate, #4 4 DA04_Atty Ltr Filed, #5 5 DA05_CCA Ltr Filed, #6 6 DA06_CCA Pro se Ext Granted, #7 7 DA07_CCA Pro se PDR, #8 8 DA08_CCA PDR Refused, #9 9 DA09_CCA Ntc re Rule 69.4(a), #10 10 DA10_App Amended Brief, #11 11 DA11_St's Brief, #12 12 DA12_PD-0914-20 PDR Ext, #13 13 DA13_PD-0914-20 PDR, #14 14 DA14_CR, #15 15 DA15_RR 1 of 11, #16 16 DA16_RR 2 of 11, #17 17 DA17_RR 3 of 11, #18 18 DA18_RR 4 of 11, #19 19 DA19_RR 5 of 11, #20 20 DA20_RR 6 of 11, #21 21 DA21_RR 7 of 11, #22 22 DA22_RR 8 of 11, #23 23 DA23_RR 9 of 11, #24 24 DA24_RR 10 of 11, #25 25 DA25_RR 11 of 11, #26 26 SH01_WR-92,927-01 Action Taken, #27 27 SH02_WR-92,927-01 Writ Received)(Harp, Sarah) |
Filing 10 Certified Mail Receipt Returned as to Naversia C. Alexander re: 6 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons, filed. (rnieto, 1) |
Filing 9 Certified Mail Receipt Returned re: 6 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (dnoriega, 1) |
Filing 8 Certified Mail Receipt Returned re: 4 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (dnoriega, 1) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah M. Harp on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin, filed. (Harp, Sarah) |
Filing 5 ORDER entered. Respondent Bobby Lumpkin is ORDERED to respond to Alexanders Petition on or before March 14, 2022. Lumpkin is ORDERED to file all state court records by March 7, 2022. Lumpkin is additionally ORDERED to print out docketed copies of these same records and send a courtesy copy of the records to the Clerk of Courts Office by November 14, 2022. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (dnoriega, 1) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM of Law re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Naversia Ce'Allen Alexander, filed.(dnoriega, 1) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Naversia Ce'Allen Alexander.(dnoriega, 1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Alexander v. Lumpkin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Naversia Ce'Allen Alexander | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin | |
Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
Represented By: | Sarah Miranda Harp |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.