Gonzales v. Davis
Petitioner: Arturo Gonzales
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Case Number: 2:2016cv00189
Filed: May 31, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Corpus Christi Office
County: Brazoria
Presiding Judge: Jason B Libby
Presiding Judge: Hilda G Tagle
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 24 . The Court GRANTS Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 17 , DISMISSES Gonzales's petition for a writ of habeas corpus 1 , and DENIES Gonzales a certificate of appealability.(Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzales v. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Arturo Gonzales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Represented By: Edward Larry Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?