Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Griebel v. Montana Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 6:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Arturo Gonzales, Jamie Michel, Montana Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Skyler Griebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salvalzo, et al. v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center
as 5:2020cv00665
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Salvalzo, Antiquin Williams, Cody Flenoury and others
Defendant:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv01783
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Arturo Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gonzales v. Davis
as 2:2016cv00189
Petitioner:
Arturo Gonzales
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arturo Gonzales v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-40669
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTURO GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
McKNight v. Reynolds, et at
as 2:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
Joshua L. McKnight
Defendant:
Christian Reynolds, Eric Guthridge, Arturo Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gonzales v. Stephens
as 2:2013cv00213
Petitioner:
Arturo Gonzales
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. Stephens -
as 3:2013cv00252
Petitioner:
Arturo Gonzales
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alejandro Hernandez-Ramos v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72096
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ-RAMOS, AKA Arturo Gonzales
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Carvajal et al v. MYD Pegasus LLC
as 2:2013cv00200
Defendant:
MYD Pegasus LLC , Maria Goumenos and Danny Goumenos
Plaintiff:
Antonio Carvajal , Arturo Gonzales , Adalberto Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
