Blanco v. GEO Group, Inc. et al;
Petitioner: Ricardo Blanco, Jr. and Richard Blanco, Jr.
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Case Number: 2:2021cv00074
Filed: April 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Julie K Hampton
Referring Judge: Drew B Tipton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2021 Filing 12 RECEIPT of Transfer Letter re: transfer of case to Western District of Texas. New Case # assigned: 5:21cv459 and received on 5/7/2021., filed. (mmapps, 4)
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to WDTX, San Antonio Division (Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified.(vrios, 2)
May 7, 2021 Interdistrict transfer to WDTX, San Antion Division. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 5/7/21, filed. (vrios, 2)
April 28, 2021 Filing 8 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Ricardo Blanco, Jr, filed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(amartinez, 2)
April 28, 2021 Filing 7 AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS: 2254 against Bobby Lumpkin filed by Ricardo Blanco, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(amartinez, 2)
April 26, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma PauperisMotions referred to Julie K Hampton. by Ricardo Blanco, Jr, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JessieHutchinson, 2)
April 26, 2021 Filing 9 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Ricardo Blanco, Jr, filed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JessieHutchinson, 2)
April 16, 2021 Filing 6 AMENDED NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Ricardo Blanco, Jr. Richard Blanco, Jr. Parties notified. Notice of Compliance due by 5/6/2021, filed. (vrios, 2)
April 16, 2021 Filing 5 SECOND AMENDED NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (vrios, 2)
April 16, 2021 Filing 4 AMENDED NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (vrios, 2)
April 16, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Ricardo Blanco, Jr. Richard Blanco, Jr. Parties notified. Notice of Compliance due by 5/6/2021, filed. (vrios, 2)
April 16, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (vrios, 2)
April 12, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00) filed by Ricardo Blanco, Jr.(vrios, 2) Modified on 4/16/2021 (vrios, 2).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blanco v. GEO Group, Inc. et al;
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ricardo Blanco, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard Blanco, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Represented By: Edward Larry Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?