White v. Lumpkin
| Christopher A White and Kasseem White-El |
| Bobby Lumpkin |
| 3:2021cv00260 |
| September 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey V Brown |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis.(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(GeorgeCardenas, 4)
|
| Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Christopher A White, filed. (RachelSalazar, 4) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to NOT Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Christopher A White, filed.(RachelSalazar, 4) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Christopher A White, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/12/2021. (RachelSalazar, 4) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Lori D. Brodbeck on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin, filed. (Brodbeck, Lori) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO ANSWER. (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) (Attachments: #1 Dkt 1 Petition) Parties notified.(ltrevino, 3)
|
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Christopher A White, filed.(ltrevino, 3) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (MarySanchez, 3) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Christopher A White. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MarySanchez, 3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
