Apache Corporation v. The New York City Employees' Retirement System et al
| Apache Corporation |
| The New York City Employees' Retirement System, The New York City Teachers' Retirement System, The New York City Police Pension Fund, The New York City Fire Department Pension Fund, The New York City Board of Education Retirement System and The Office of the Comptroller of the City of New York |
| 4:2008cv01064 |
| April 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Securities/Commodities Office |
| Harris |
| Gray H. Miller |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER. Apache properly excluded the Proposal from the proxy statement mailed to its shareholders. The parties are ORDERED to submit to the court briefs outlining their respective positions on the award of attorneys fees. Apache must submit their brief no later than 5/2/2008. Defendants must submit their response no later than 5/9/2008.( Signed by Judge Gray H. Miller ) Parties notified.(rkonieczny)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER DENYING 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order; setting Preliminary Injunction Hearing for 4/21/2008 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9D before Judge Gray H. Miller.( Signed by Judge Gray H. Miller ) Parties notified.(rkonieczny)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
