Cases 1 - 10 of 44
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07351
Plaintiff:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., John Stankey, Randall L. Stephenson and others
Petitioner:
Velliv, Pension & Livsforsikring A/S, Bridget N. Smagala Revocable Trust U/A DTD, New Mexico State Investment Council and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
BRAZINSKY v. AT&T INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04064
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRAZINSKY
Defendant:
AT&T INC., RANDALL L. STEPHENSON, JOHN T. STANKEY and others
Petitioner:
GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, BRIDGET N. SMAGALA REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DTD, SURESH KODALI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv08968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Pinto et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv10154
Plaintiff:
Mr. Vincent Pinto and Police Officer Vincent Pinto
Defendant:
New York City Police Department, CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Police Pension Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The New York City Employees' Retirement System et al v. Transdigm Group, Inc.
as 1:2018cv11344
Plaintiff:
The New York City Police Pension Fund, The New York City Fire Department Pension Fund, The New York City Board of Education Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Transdigm Group, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06410
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06411
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
In Re: Petrobras Securities
as 18-2324
Plaintiff:
Aura Capital Ltd., Dimensional Emerging Markets Value Fund, DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc., on behalf of its series Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Peter Kaltman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Union Asset Management Holding AG and Jonathan Messing, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Appellant:
Pomerantz LLP
Defendant - Appellee:
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras, BB Securities Ltd., Theodore Marshall Helms and others
Defendant:
Mariangela Mointeiro Tizatto, Josue Christiano Gome Da Silva, Daniel Lima De Oliveira and others
Appellee:
Mathis B. Bishop, Catherine O. Bishop, Joseph Gielata and others
In Re: Petrobras Securities
as 18-2324
Plaintiff:
Aura Capital Ltd., Dimensional Emerging Markets Value Fund, DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc., on behalf of its series Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio and others
Appellant:
Pomerantz LLP
Defendant / Appellee:
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras, BB Securities Ltd., Theodore Marshall Helms and others
Defendant:
Mariangela Mointeiro Tizatto, Josue Christiano Gome Da Silva, Daniel Lima De Oliveira and others
Appellee:
Mathis B. Bishop, Catherine O. Bishop, Joseph Gielata and others
In Re: Petrobras Securities
as 18-2276
Plaintiff:
Aura Capital Ltd., Dimensional Emerging Markets Value Fund, DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc., on behalf of its series Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited, Peter Kaltman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Union Asset Management Holding AG and others
Appellant:
Mathis B. Bishop, Catherine O. Bishop, Joseph Gielata and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras, Jose Sergio Gabrielli, Silvio Sinedino Pinheiro and others
Defendant:
Mariangela Mointeiro Tizatto, Josue Christiano Gome Da Silva, Daniel Lima De Oliveira and others
Objector - Appellant:
Spencer Bueno
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
