Edwards v. Astrue

Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff: Lisa Edwards
Case Number: 4:2013cv01480
Filed: May 20, 2013
Court: Texas Southern District Court
Office: Houston Office
County: Harris
Referring Judge: Frances H Stacy
Presiding Judge: Ewing Werlein
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 30, 2014 21 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 19 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment , granting 16 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment . The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy) Parties notified.(glyons, 4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edwards v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Edwards
Represented By: Donald Clifton Dewberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.