Propper et al v. StarStone Specialty Insurance Company
| Sami Ahmad and Maarten Propper |
| StarStone Specialty Insurance Company f/k/a Torus Specialty Insurance Company and StarStone Specialty Insurance Company |
| 4:2019cv01752 |
| May 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to StarStone Specialty Insurance Company served on 5/13/2019, answer due 7/12/2019, filed.(Vandenbout, Justin) |
Filing 3
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols re Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 8/27/2019 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(lgouadi, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against StarStone Specialty Insurance Company f/k/a Torus Specialty Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22414891) filed by Maarten Propper, Sami Ahmad. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vandenbout, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
