Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Bridges v. Maxum Indemnity Company et al
as 2:2024cv10139
Plaintiff: Lauren Bridges
Defendant: Maxum Indemnity Company, Starstone Insurance Company, Landmark American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. JAX146480 et al v. Sonshine Baptist Church of Port Charlotte, Florida, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01211
Petitioner: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. JAX146480 and StarStone Specialty Insurance Company
Respondent: Sonshine Baptist Church of Port Charlotte, Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Type: Contract Insurance
Kim v. Accident Insurance Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01220
Counter Plaintiff: StarStone Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Jee Yun Kim
Defendant: Accident Insurance Company, Inc., Torus Specialty Insurance Company, Sanchez Construction and others
Counter Defendant: Elezar Hernandez Cupido and Leticia Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Bulldog, Inc. et al v. StarStone Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv06597
Plaintiff: The Bulldog, Inc., Beer Buds, LLC, Vessel NOLA, LLC and others
Defendant: StarStone Specialty Insurance Company, Arthur J Gallagher Risk Management Services, LLC, Amwins Insurance Brokers, LLC and others
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
ABCNY, Inc. v. Axis Surplus Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv09094
Plaintiff: ABCNY, Inc.
Defendant: Axis Surplus Insurance Company, Landmark American Insurance Company and StarStone Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 in Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Amyn, Inc. v. StarStone Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv07924
Plaintiff: Amyn, Inc. dba Jewelry on 7th and Amyn, Inc. doing business as Jewelry on 7th
Defendant: StarStone Specialty Insurance Company, Does 1 through 30, inclusive and Certain Underwriters At Lloyds, London Subscribing To Policy No. Ss0002319/0010.o
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Quarter Holdings, L.L.C. et al v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02064
Plaintiff: Quarter Holdings, L.L.C., Magnolia Enterprises, Inc., Willie's Canal, LLC and others
Defendant: Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, StarStone Specialty Insurance Company, Everest Indemnity Insurance Company and others
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Hanover Foods Corporation v. Axis Surplus Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv04842
Plaintiff: Hanover Foods Corporation
Defendant: Axis Surplus Insurance Company, Everest Indemnity Insurance Company, Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: BRIDGEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY and FIDELIS UNDERWRITING LIMITED, LIRMA F0012
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 in Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
StarStone Specialty Insurance Company v. Cogut et al
as 1:2023cv04518
Plaintiff: StarStone Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant: Craig Cogut and Joel Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 jd Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance
Daileader v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Syndicate 18
as 23-690
Plaintiff / Appellant: Timothy Daileader
Defendant / Appellee: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Syndicate 1861, Subscribing to Policy No. ANV122398A, Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, Subscribing to Policy Number, DOH00746111 and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?