Wright v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
Timothy Wright |
Daniel D Dickerson, T. Hutto, Dr. Nathaniel Robertson, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice and Khari Mott |
4:2019cv03706 |
September 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Vanessa D Gilmore |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. For the reasons stated in this Court's #4 Memorandum on Dismissal entered this date, this civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice....*** Case terminated on 11/4/19. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM ON DISMISSAL. Pltf failed to timely submit a completed complaint form. The plaintiff's failure to pursue this action forces this Court to conclude that he lacks due diligence. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) |
Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Timothy Wright. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 10/31/2019, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix) (bgoolsby, 4) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (dwilkerson, 3) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Timothy Wright.(dwilkerson, 3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.