Wright v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
Plaintiff: Timothy Wright
Defendant: Daniel D Dickerson, T. Hutto, Dr. Nathaniel Robertson, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice and Khari Mott
Case Number: 4:2019cv03706
Filed: September 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Vanessa D Gilmore
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. For the reasons stated in this Court's #4 Memorandum on Dismissal entered this date, this civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice....*** Case terminated on 11/4/19. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
November 4, 2019 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM ON DISMISSAL. Pltf failed to timely submit a completed complaint form. The plaintiff's failure to pursue this action forces this Court to conclude that he lacks due diligence. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
October 1, 2019 Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Timothy Wright. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 10/31/2019, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix) (bgoolsby, 4)
September 27, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (dwilkerson, 3)
September 25, 2019 Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Timothy Wright.(dwilkerson, 3)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel D Dickerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Hutto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Nathaniel Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Khari Mott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?