Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Khatib v. Millar et al
as 1:2026cv00290
Defendant:
Matthew Millar, Lesly-Ann Cosgro, Paul Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
Aimee Khatib
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wright et al v. Marshall County Coal Resources, Inc. et al
as 5:2026cv00033
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wright and Kelly Wright
Defendant:
Marshall County Coal Resources, Inc. and American Consolidated Natural Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Walker et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv13617
Plaintiff:
Maurice Walker, Ricky D. Walker, William Walker and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 a1 Federal Officer Removal
Walker et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2025cv09048
Plaintiff:
Maurice Walker, Ricky D. Walker, William Walker and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Walker et al v. 3M Company et al
as NYS/1:25-cv-09048
Plaintiff:
Maurice Walker, Ricky D. Walker, William Walker and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wright v. Angiodynamics, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv02067
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wright
Defendant:
Angiodynamics, Inc., Navilyst Medical, Inc. and PFM Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Wright v. Angiodynamics, Inc. et al
as CAS/3:25-cv-02067
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wright
Defendant:
Angiodynamics, Inc., Navilyst Medical, Inc. and PFM Medical, Inc.
Wright v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2025cv00323
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wright
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
