Gonzalez v. Target Corporation
| Luis Gonzalez |
| Target Corporation |
| 4:2021cv00532 |
| February 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Charles Eskridge |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTE ENTRY ORDER: The Court held the Initial Conference. The Court admonished the parties to review and strictly follow Judge Eskridges procedures. Appearances: Andrew Darshan Kumar, Valerie Lu Ly. Ct Reporter: ERO. Digital Number: 9:29-9:31AM.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon) Parties notified.(sjones, 4)
|
| Filing 10 Amended INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Luis Gonzalez, filed.(Kumar, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 Agreed JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Target Corporation, filed.(Ly, Valerie) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses by Luis Gonzalez, filed. (Kumar, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Defendant's Initial Disclosures by Target Corporation, filed. (Ly, Valerie) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Luis Gonzalez, filed.(Kumar, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Target Corporation, filed.(Ly, Valerie) |
|
Filing 4
SCHEDULING and DOCKET CONTROL ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 06/08/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 05/07/2021. Plaintiff Expert Report due by 12/07/2021. Deft Expert Report due by 01/06/2022. Discovery due by 02/23/2022. Mediation due by 05/10/2022. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 03/25/2022. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 03/25/2022. Joint Pretrial Order due by 06/09/2022. Docket Call set for 07/18/2022 at 9:30 AM before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jengonzalezadi) (Entered: 03/05/2021)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/7/2021 at 09:30 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalezadi, 4)
|
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Target Corporation, filed.(Ly, Valerie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 129th Judicial District of Harris County, case number 2021-02965 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-25979664) filed by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit All processes, #2 Exhibit Pleadings, #3 Exhibit Index of Matters Filed, #4 Exhibit List of Counsel)(Ly, Valerie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gonzalez v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Luis Gonzalez | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Darshan Kumar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Valerie Lu Ly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
