Tucker v. Lumpkin
Defendant: Mr. Tucker LaRay Brent
Petitioner: Brent LaRay Tucker
Respondent: Director Bobby Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin
Case Number: 4:2021cv04185
Filed: December 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Keith P Ellison
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2022 Filing 8 PETITION/COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-27774512.) filed by Brent LaRay Tucker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit to Writ - Ex2 CV of Expert, #2 Exhibit Exhibit to Writ - Ex3 Research articles relevant to the 1st outcry DC, classic tactile hallucination, #3 Exhibit Ex4 DNA Results Brent is Excluded 199-201, #4 Exhibit Ex5 Polygraph no deception, #5 Exhibit Ex6Expert DNA Dr. Salih owner of Certif DNA Lab in Texas - DNA doesnt fall off and no evid degradation, #6 Exhibit Ex7 Expert DNA Dr. Kessis DNA doesnt fall off and no evid, #7 Exhibit Ex8 Expert Child Psych, Dr Carter, Trial Lawyers failed to obj or examine, #8 Exhibit Ex9 Brent Tucker, Declaration)(Hemphill, Sharon)
January 21, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah M. Harp on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin, filed. (Harp, Sarah)
January 10, 2022 Filing 6 Certified Mail Receipt Returned as to Edward Marshal - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4)
January 4, 2022 ***Delivery Confirmation for delivery date(s) Status Unavailable re: 5 Document(s) Sent,, filed. (dhansen, 4)
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO ANSWER. Answer due for Bobby Lumpkin 3/1/2022 (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(olindor, 4)
December 30, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Bobby Lumpkin. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(hlerma, 4)
December 29, 2021 Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Bobby Lumpkin, filed.(Hemphill, Sharon)
December 27, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0541-27525096) filed by Tucker LaRay Brent.(Hemphill, Sharon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tucker v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. Tucker LaRay Brent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director Bobby Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Represented By: Sarah Miranda Harp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brent LaRay Tucker
Represented By: Sharon Hemphill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?