Thomas v. Sanchez et al
| Jewell Thomas |
| Jerry Sanchez, Isaac Kwarteng, Bryan Collier and Leah Rea |
| 4:2022cv01776 |
| May 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to Corpus Christi Division (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
|
| Intradistrict Transfer to Corpus Christi, filed. (gclair, 4) |
| Filing 6 Claims by Jewell Thomas, filed.(jdav, 4) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jewell Thomas filed by Jewell Thomas. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Jewell Thomas. (VanesaAranda, 3) |
| Filing 4 Letter from Jewell Thomas re: Case number, IFP and Certificate of Inmate Account, filed. (Forms mailed out via USPS) (VanesaAranda, 3) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (AkeitaMichael, 4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jewell Thomas, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/21/2022. (AkeitaMichael, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Bryan Collier, Isaac Kwarteng, Jerry Sanchez filed by Jewell Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(AkeitaMichael, 4) Modified on 6/1/2022 (AkeitaMichael, 4). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
