Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Thomas v. Sanchez
as 24-40181
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Jerry Sanchez, Warden, Isaac Kwarteng, Medical Director, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Thomas v. Linthicum
as 24-40165
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Lanette Linthicum, Isaac Kwarteng, Jerry Sanchez and others
Thomas v. Amonett et al
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 23-40681
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jewell Thomas
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Thomas v. Morton et al
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Dr. Gary Morton, Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Dr. Lanette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Anciso
as 23-40494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Pricsylla Anciso, Correctional Officer Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Juan Nunez, Deputy Warden Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Skinner Sturgis, Captain Deputy Warden Texas Department of Corrections and others
Thomas v. Jasso
as 23-40446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Abel Jasso, Luiz Garcia, Elbert Holmes and others
Thomas v. Holmes et al
as 2:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego, Dr Issac Kwarteng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv01547
Petitioner:
Jewell Thomas
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Nino
as 23-40385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Nino, Gage Rivas, Matthew Herrera and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
