Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Thomas v. Amonett et al
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Morton et al
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Dr. Gary Morton, Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Dr. Lanette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Holmes et al
as 2:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego, Dr Issac Kwarteng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv01547
Petitioner:
Jewell Thomas
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Linthicum et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Lanette Linthicum, Eric Hustak, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Jasso et al
as 2:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Abel Jasso, Luiz Garcia, Elbert Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Upshaw
as 6:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Michael Upshaw, Phillip Kent Lucas, Deana Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Anciso et al
as 2:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Pricsylla Anciso, Juan Nunez, Skinner Sturgis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 2:2022cv00250
Petitioner:
Jewell Thomas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Nino et al
as 2:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Andrew Nino, Gage Rivas, Matthew Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
