Foster v. Director, TDCJ-CID
| Darwin Bernard Foster |
| Director TDCJ-CID |
| 4:2022cv03411 |
| October 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER. This case will be dismissed if the Court does not receive petitioner's signed habeas petition and the $5.00 filing fee or properlysupported application to proceed informa pauperis by NOVEMBER 30, 2022.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER Regarding Unsigned Habeas Petition. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(kpicota, 4)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (BrendaLacy, 4) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from Texas Northern. Case Number 2:22-cv-00192; certified copy of transfer order, certified docket sheet, and transfer letter received |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, HOUSTON DIVISION (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 10/4/2022) (daa)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TEMPORARILY GRANTING PERMISSION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PENDING SUPPLEMENTATION (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 10/4/2022) (daa)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4,5. Tue Oct 4 11:17:02 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Darwin Bernard Foster. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (awc) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (awc) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (awc) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. (Copy of first page of file-marked petition also mailed to petitioner.) Mon Oct 3 15:52:39 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Foster v. Director, TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Darwin Bernard Foster | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Director TDCJ-CID | |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
