Flores et al v. Pristine General Contractors, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Phillis Flores and Tamara Sanford
Defendant: Pristine General Contractors, Inc., Diana ZUNIGA and Ricardo Martinez
Case Number: 4:2023cv00533
Filed: February 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Andrew S Hanen
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2023 ***Delivery Confirmation for delivery date(s) 3/24/2023 re: 6 Document(s) Sent, filed. (KimberlyPicota, 4)
March 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AGREED ORDER GRANTING REMAND TO STATE COURT. This case is remanded to the 284th District Court of Montgomery County Texas. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
March 15, 2023 Filing 4 Agreed PROPOSED ORDER Granting Remand to State Court, filed.(Meek, Noah)
February 20, 2023 Filing 3 Agreement between All Parties by Ricardo Martinez, Pristine General Contractors, Inc., Diana Zuniga, filed.(Meek, Noah)
February 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/16/2023 at 10:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(ClaudiaGutierrez, 4)
February 13, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29459735) filed by Pristine General Contractors, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Appendix List of Counsel, #2 Appendix State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit State Court Filings, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Meek, Noah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flores et al v. Pristine General Contractors, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phillis Flores
Represented By: Arturo Cuauhtemoc Aguilar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamara Sanford
Represented By: Arturo Cuauhtemoc Aguilar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pristine General Contractors, Inc.
Represented By: Noah Earnest Wotring Meek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diana ZUNIGA
Represented By: Noah Earnest Wotring Meek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ricardo Martinez
Represented By: Noah Earnest Wotring Meek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?