Burke v. Bridges et al
Andrew Burke |
Chad Bridges, Eric Fagan, Chief Deputy Provost and Captain Chesser |
4:2023cv01011 |
March 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
George C Hanks |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CLERKS NOTICE to Prisoner. Parties notified, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (bgoolsby, 4) |
Filing 7 (Docketed in Error) CLERKS NOTICE to Prisoner. Parties notified, filed. (bgoolsby, 4) Modified on 4/10/2023 (bgoolsby, 4). |
Filing 6 Letter from Andrew Burke re: status of cases, filed. (HeatherCarr, 4) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED. Case terminated on 3/27/2023 (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(KimberlyPicota, 4) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Andrew Burke, filed. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Andrew Burke, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/7/2023. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Chad Bridges, Captain Chesser, Chief Deputy Provost, Eric Fagan (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Andrew Burke.(ShannonHolden, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.