Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID ***CASE TRANSFERRED TO LUFKIN***
as 6:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Mundin
as 24-20103
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Joann Mundin, Dawn Simmons, Nurse Practitioner, Lieutenant Reiser and others
Burke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00527
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Andrew Burke v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Andrew Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Beardsley et al v. County of Saratoga
as 1:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
Brendan Beardsley, Nicole Hollner, Susan Traver and others
Defendant:
County of Saratoga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Burke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04056
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11647
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDREW BURK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
