Laws v. Lumpkin et al
| Randall Glen Laws and Randell Glen Laws |
| Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Kelly Strong, Major Canul, UTMB Correctional Managed Care and UTMB CMC |
| 4:2023cv03686 |
| September 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on 11/14/2023 (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(KimberlyPicota, 4)
|
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(KimberlyPicota, 4)
|
| Filing 7 MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT by Randell Glen Laws, filed.(AkeitaMichael, 4) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT as to Randell Glen Laws. More Definite Statement due by 11/30/2023(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(KimberlyPicota, 4)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (AaronJackson, 4) |
| Filing 2 ***DOCKETED IN ERROR NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (AaronJackson, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Randall Glen Laws. (AaronJackson, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
