De La Cruz v. Lumpkin
Andrea De La Cruz |
Bobby Lumpkin and Ed Gonzalez |
4:2023cv03965 |
October 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
David Hittner |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Andrea De La Cruz re: #5 Order of Dismissal,, filed. Address has been updated and Order has been mailed to corrected address. (AkeitaMichael, 4) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. For the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on this date, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Case terminated on 10/30/2023. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. De La Cruz's petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241, (Dkt. #1 ), is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust her available state remedies. Any pending motions are DENIED as moot. No certificate of appealability will issue from this decision. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Andrea De La Cruz, filed. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Andrea De La Cruz.(ShannonHolden, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.