Ruiz Cubillan v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
| Jose Alejandro Ruiz Cubillan |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kristi Noem, Kika Scott and Bryan Hemming |
| 4:2025cv02037 |
| May 5, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CLERKS NOTICE OF CANCELLATION Initial Conference set for 10/28/2025 at 10:15 a.m. is CANCELED. Parties notified, filed. (svj4) |
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Motion to Stay. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is stated until February 11, 2026. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (knp4)
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION to Stay by Bryan Hemming, Kristi Noem, Kika Scott, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/22/2025. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Luong, Michelle) |
| Filing 12 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation, #2 Continuation, #3 Continuation, #4 Continuation, #5 Continuation, #6 Continuation) (Jacobi, William) |
| Filing 11 STATUS REPORT by Jose Alejandro Ruiz Cubillan, filed. (Jacobi, William) |
| Filing 10 STATUS REPORT by Jose Alejandro Ruiz Cubillan, filed. (Jacobi, William) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS. Proof of Service must be filed by September 1, 2025. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (jg4)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference set for 10/28/2025 at 10:15 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett, filed. (svj4) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (bmn4) |
| Filing 6 Request for Issuance of Summons as to U.S. Department of Homeland Security, filed. (Jacobi, William) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (bli4) |
| Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation, #2 Continuation, #3 Continuation, #4 Continuation) (Jacobi, William) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/8/2025 at 10:15 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett) Parties notified. (gc4)
|
| Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (gc4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Richard W. Bennett randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (gc4) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-33367526) filed by Jose Alejandro Ruiz Cubillan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Jacobi, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
