Lopez Garcia v. Noem et al
| Jose Alberto Lopez Garcia |
| Todd Lyons, Marcos Charles, Pam Bondi, Warden, Montgomery Processing Center and Kristi Noem |
| 4:2026cv00934 |
| February 5, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STATUS REPORT by Pam Bondi, Marcos Charles, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Wiley, Ariel) |
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTS IN PART the Petition for Habeas Corpus and DENIES Respondents Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified. (aar4)
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to File.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified. (aar4)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Response to Respondents' Motion to Dismiss and in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment by Jose Alberto Lopez Garcia, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/31/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rivera, Roberto) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition to Respondents' Motion to Dismiss and in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Jose Alberto Lopez Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rivera, Roberto) |
| Filing 8 Amended RESPONSE to #7 Order to Answer, #5 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc., , filed by Pam Bondi, Marcos Charles, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem. (Wiley, Ariel) |
Filing 7
ORDER TO ANSWER. Answer due for Pam Bondi 3/2/2026; Marcos Charles 3/2/2026; Todd Lyons 3/2/2026; Kristi Noem 3/2/2026; Warden, Montgomery Processing Center 3/2/2026 (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified. (aar4)
|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #4 Order to Answer, , filed by Pam Bondi, Marcos Charles, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem. (Wiley, Ariel) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED PETITION against Pam Bondi, Marcos Charles, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, Warden, Montgomery Processing Center filed by Jose Alberto Lopez Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1 Detainee Locator, #2 Exhibit Ex 2 NTA, #3 Exhibit Ex 3 EOIR Case Status) (Rivera, Roberto) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO ANSWER. Answer due for Pam Bondi 2/17/2026; Marcos Charles 2/17/2026; Todd Lyons 2/17/2026; Kristi Noem 2/17/2026; Warden, Montgomery Processing Center 2/17/2026 (Served electronically on USAO per MOU.) (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified. (aar4)
|
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Redaction Responsibilities and Privacy Protection. Parties notified, filed. (SDTX_CMECF_AutoDocket, ) |
| Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (abh4) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXSDC-35031275) filed by Jose Alberto Lopez Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1 Detainee Locator, #2 Exhibit Ex 2 NTA, #3 Exhibit Ex 3 EOIR Case Status) (Rivera, Roberto) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Christina A. Bryan randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (abh4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.