United States Of America v. Nine Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars ($9,800.00) In United States Currency and Sixteen Pieces of Jewelry
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: Nine Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars ($9,800.00) In United States Currency and Sixteen Pieces of Jewelry
Case Number: 7:2008cv00010
Filed: January 18, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Drug Related Seizure of Property Office
County: Hidalgo
Presiding Judge: Dorina Ramos
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States Of America v. Nine Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars ($9,800.00) In United States Currency and Sixteen Pieces of Jewelry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Represented By: Allan Alvin Hoffmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nine Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars ($9,800.00) In United States Currency and Sixteen Pieces of Jewelry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?