MONTEJANO v. Blinken
Plaintiff: CRISTIAN ENRIQUE MONTEJANO
Defendant: Antony J Blinken and United States Of America
Case Number: 7:2024cv00023
Filed: January 25, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Ricardo H Hinojosa
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2024 Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER re: #8 Unopposed MOTION for Continuance of Initial Pretrial Conference, filed. (Zimliki, Lindsay)
March 21, 2024 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Continuance of Initial Pretrial Conference by Antony J Blinken, United States Of America, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/11/2024. (Zimliki, Lindsay)
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Lindsay W. Zimliki to Appear Pro Hac Vice Note: Instructions to request Texas Southern CM/ECF registration through PACER are found #here.(Signed by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified. (JenniferNogueira, 7)
March 19, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Lindsay W. Zimliki (Fee Exempt) by Antony J Blinken, United States Of America, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/9/2024. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted attachment Certificate of Service) (Zimliki, Lindsay)
January 29, 2024 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(KarenLLopez, 7)
January 27, 2024 Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed.(Diez, Jaime)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/4/2024 at 02:30 PM before Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa(by Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa) Parties notified.(JenniferNogueira, 7)
January 25, 2024 Filing 2 SEALED EXHIBITS by CRISTIAN ENRIQUE MONTEJANO, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14) (Diez, Jaime)
January 25, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31107572) filed by CRISTIAN ENRIQUE MONTEJANO.(Diez, Jaime)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MONTEJANO v. Blinken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CRISTIAN ENRIQUE MONTEJANO
Represented By: Jaime M Diez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony J Blinken
Represented By: Lindsay Zimliki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Of America
Represented By: Lindsay Zimliki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?