Cantu v. 401 Sycamore, LLC et al
Marco A. Cantu |
401 Sycamore, LLC, Idalia Plata, Thornton, Biechlin, Segreta, Reynolds & Guerra, L.C., ralph Garcia, Michelle Crane, Randy Crane, David Lumber, Carlos Guerra and Michael Moore |
7:2024cv00057 |
February 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Peter Bray |
Drew B Tipton |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ADVISORY by Marco A. Cantu, filed. (jen7) |
Filing 14 ADVISORY by Thornton, Biechlin, Segreta, Reynolds & Guerra, L.C., filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Cuellar, Joseph) |
Filing 13 ORDER, Initial conference set 4/23/2024 is terminated. Motions taken under advisement. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray) Parties notified. (jmm4) |
Filing 12 JOINDER in #7 Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand, filed by 401 Sycamore, LLC. (Cuellar, Joseph) |
Filing 11 *DOCKETED IN ERROR* JOINDER in #5 MOTION to Remand , filed by 401 Sycamore, LLC. (Cuellar, Joseph) Modified on 3/21/2024 (kll7). |
Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED Motions referred to Peter Bray. by Michael Moore, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/2/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order of Dismissal)(Moore, J.) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss ( Motion Docket Date 3/28/2024.), MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Motions referred to Peter Bray. by ralph Garcia, Thornton, Biechlin, Segreta, Reynolds & Guerra, L.C., filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (amended original petition in -57 case), #2 Exhibit B (original petition in -185 case), #3 Exhibit C (record of motions hearing in -185 case), #4 Exhibit D (order dismissing appeal from -185 case), #5 Exhibit E (order denying mandamus petition from -185 case), #6 Exhibit F (third amended complaint in -299 case))(Cuellar, Joseph) |
Filing 8 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/23/2024 at 10:30 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray(Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray) Parties notified.(JasonMarchand, 4) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition to #5 MOTION to Remand, filed by Carlos Guerra, David Lumber. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lumber, David) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF REFERENCE to Magistrate Judge Peter Bray.(Signed by Judge Drew B Tipton) (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) Parties notified.(KelliePapaioannou, 2) |
Filing 5 OPPOSED MOTION to Remand by Marco A. Cantu, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/21/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(KarenLLopez, 7) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Carlos Guerra, David Lumber, filed.(Lumber, David) |
Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Carlos Guerra, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/19/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lumber, David) |
Filing 2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by David Lumber, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/18/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lumber, David) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 464th District Court Hidalgo County, case number C-0749-24-L (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31217973) filed by David Lumber. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit Orig Petition, #3 Exhibit Amended Pet, #4 Exhibit Plata Answer)(Lumber, David) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/20/2024: #5 Redacted Petition) (JenniferNogueira, 7). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.