Clark et al v. Centene Corporation et al
| Kathy Clark, Amy Endsley, Susan Grimmett, Margueriette Schmoll and Kevin Ulrich |
| Centene Company of Texas, L.P., Centene Corporation and Superior HealthPlan, Inc. |
| 1:2012cv00174 |
| February 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Sam Sparks |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
156
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs Rose Guajardo and Angelita Cervantez's claims against Defendant Centene Company of Texas, L.P. are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Cynthia Cantu, Cordelia Garcia, Sherri Hodsdon, a nd Margueriette Schmoll' s claims against Defendant Centene Company of Texas, L.P. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time-barred; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Centene' s 149 Motion for Judgment on Partial Findings is GRANTED TN PART and DENIED IN PART as described in this opinion. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (klw)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Defendant Centene Company of Texas, L.P.'s 110 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING Defendant Centene Company of Texas, L.P.'s 111 Motion to Decertify; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Plaintiff's 113 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (klw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
