Nutt v. Texas Farmers Insurance Company
| Nutt and Daryl Nutt |
| Texas Farmers Insurance Company |
| 1:2016cv00433 |
| April 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4072 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT dismissing action without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (klw) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Daryl Nutt (Ciccone, Anthony) |
Filing 4
ORDER that the removing party supplement the record. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (so)
|
| Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Texas Farmers Insurance Company. (Jones, Bradley) |
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT JS44 by Texas Farmers Insurance Company. (Jones, Bradley) (Main Document 2 replaced on 4/5/2016 to flatten image) (so). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Texas Farmers Insurance Company (Receipt #0542-8352246, Filing fee $400), filed by Texas Farmers Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jones, Bradley) (Attachment 2 replaced on 4/5/2016 to flatten image) (so). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (so) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
