Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Nutt v. Target Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv04193
Plaintiff:
Taylor Nutt
Defendant:
Target Corporation and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
United States of America v. Singletary, II. (David Singletary)
as 26-2018
Defendant:
DWIGHT A SINGLETARY, II, MCKENZIE MERRIALICE COLES, NEHEMIAH FANE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ditona v. Nutt
as 8:2026cv01916
Plaintiff:
Darren Ditona
Defendant:
Colonel Roger Nutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Bastrop County, Texas et al
as 1:2026cv01841
Plaintiff:
Chamita L. Griffin
Defendant:
Bastrop County, Texas, Bastrop County District Clerk's Office, City of Smithville, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tanner Ball v. Jacob Benton, et al
as 26-5579
Plaintiff:
TANNER BALL
Defendant:
JACOB BENTON, Correctional Officer at Kentucky State Penitentiary, ABIGAIL NUTT, Lieutenant at Kentucky State Penitentiary, LAURA PLAPPERT, Warden at Kentucky State Penitentiary and others
Monroe-Hinds #706674 v. Brokaw et al
as 1:2026cv01899
Plaintiff:
Jahlen Dwayne Monroe-Hinds #706674
Defendant:
Richard Brokaw, Unknown Jones, Unknown Headen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2026cv05782
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant:
Eric Sullivan, Timothy McCarthy and Nutt Law Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Kenneth Cross, Jr. v. Johnathan Nutt
as 26-1318
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Cross, Jr.
Defendant:
State Trooper Johnathan Nutt
Ball v. Benton et al
as 5:2026cv00032
Plaintiff:
Tanner Ball
Defendant:
Jacob Benton, Abigail Nutt, Laura Plappert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
