Carr v. Gonzalez et al
Raymond E. Carr |
Probable Cause Judge, Texas Post Master General, New Hope Housing, UTMB Medical Department, Ed Gonzalez, Wells Fargo Bank, Imperio Used Car Dealership, Krash Cabin Management, ISS Facility/International Airline Security, Art Acevedo, U.S. Postal Service and Houston Police Department |
1:2019cv00506 |
May 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Andrew W Austin |
Robert Pitman |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case transferred from TXWD has been received and opened in TXSD, Houston Division as case number 4:19-cv-01754. (dm) |
Filing 5 ORDERED that the above-referenced case is TRANSFERRED to the Houston Division of the Southern District of Texas. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm) |
Filing 4 Case Opening Letter mailed to Robert Carr. (dl) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raymond E. Carr. Motions referred to Judge Andrew W. Austin. (dl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Raymond E. Carr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dl) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Andrew W. Austin. (dl) |
Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to Complaint by Raymond E. Carr. (dl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.