Johns v. Lumpkin
Henry Lee Johns |
Lorie Davis and Bobby Lumpkin |
1:2020cv00904 |
August 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Mark Lane |
Robert Pitman |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 FINAL JUDGMENT. Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj) |
Filing 4 ORDER that the Application for Habeas Corpus Relief, filed by PetitionerHenry Lee Johns is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust his state court remedies and a certificate of appealability is DENIED.Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj) |
Text Order GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Judge Mark Lane. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmj) |
Filing 3 Case Opening Letter mailed to Henry Lee Johns. (cj) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Henry Lee Johns.. Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (cj) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Henry Lee Johns. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Civil Cover Sheet and Envelope)(cj) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (cj) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.