Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Walgreen Co.
Plaintiff: Symbology Innovations, LLC
Defendant: Walgreen Co.
Case Number: 1:2021cv00413
Filed: May 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Lee Yeakel
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2021 Filing 12 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (jv2)
May 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER CLOSING CASE. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (jv2)
May 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING Andrew S. Curfman's #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (jv2)
May 17, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Symbology Innovations, LLC (Johnson, Jay)
May 14, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Andrew S. Curfman ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14806835) by on behalf of Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Courts of Admission)(Curfman, Andrew)
May 11, 2021 Filing 7 Pro Hac Vice Letter Andrew S. Curfman. (dl)
May 11, 2021 Filing 6 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office along with copy of Complaint. (dl)
May 11, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Walgreen Co.. (dl)
May 11, 2021 Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Johnson, Jay)
May 11, 2021 Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Johnson, Jay)
May 11, 2021 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Johnson, Jay) (Main Document 2 replaced on 5/11/2021 to flatten image) (dl).
May 11, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14791104), filed by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Johnson, Jay) (Attachment 3 replaced on 5/11/2021 to flatten image) (dl).
May 11, 2021 Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl)
May 11, 2021 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Symbology Innovations, LLC. (dl)
May 11, 2021 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Austin. (dl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Walgreen Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walgreen Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Symbology Innovations, LLC
Represented By: Jay B. Johnson
Represented By: Andrew S. Curfman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?