Jalali v. Blinken et al
Ali Jalali |
Antony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Christopher Wray, Richard C. Visek and Chip Laitinen |
1:2022cv00173 |
February 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Lee Yeakel |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER CLOSING CASE. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (jv2) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Ali Jalali (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney. (klw) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Ali Jalali. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (dl) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Ali Jalali. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Injunctive Relief and Petition for Writ of Mandamus ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15754284), filed by Ali Jalali. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell (dl) |
Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.