McCray v. Polk et al
Petitioner: Endicott McCray
Respondent: Balden Polk and Bobby Lumpkin
Case Number: 1:2022cv00796
Filed: August 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Lane
Referring Judge: Lee Yeakel
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Bobby Lumpkin answer due 10/12/2022. (jv2)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer with Brief in Support by Bobby Lumpkin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (Brodbeck, Lori)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Respondent's answer is due on or before October 12, 2022. Entered by Judge Mark Lane. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmj)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Lori Brodbeck on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin. Attorney Lori Brodbeck added to party Bobby Lumpkin(pty:res) (Brodbeck, Lori)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Respondent to Answer Petition. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (dm)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case Opening Letter mailed to Endicott McCray. (rn)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER (DATED 08/11/2016) REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (rn)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXWDC-16380535), filed by Endicott McCray. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Brief Motion for Rhines Stay, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order for Stay)(McLauchlan, Robert)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rn)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane (rn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCray v. Polk et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Endicott McCray
Represented By: Robert A. McLauchlan, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Balden Polk
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Represented By: Lori Brodbeck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?