Harp v. United States Space Force et al
Plaintiff: Seth Harp
Defendant: United States Space Force, Department of The Air Force and Department Of Defense
Case Number: 1:2022cv00972
Filed: September 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Lee Yeakel
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to United States Attorney. (jv2)
October 27, 2022 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jv2)
October 27, 2022 Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Seth Harp. (Amended) (Harp, Seth)
October 21, 2022 Filing 6 DEFICIENCY NOTICE to Seth Harp: re #5 Request for Issuance of Summons. Your summons is deficient because it lists three (3) parties on each summons to be served. Please list on ONE party PER summons and resubmit your request. Additionally, please style the case number correctly at 1:22-cv-972 LY. (klw)
October 21, 2022 Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Seth Harp. (Harp, Seth)
October 21, 2022 Filing 4 COMPLAINT, filed by Seth Harp.(dm)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Susan Hightower. (dm)
October 21, 2022 CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower. (dm)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER (dated 08/11/2016) REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. Referral Magistrate Judge: Susan Hightower. (pg)
September 26, 2022 Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (pg)
September 26, 2022 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower (pg)
September 26, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Seth Harp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pl's Original Complaint)(Harp, Seth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harp v. United States Space Force et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Seth Harp
Represented By: Seth Harp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Space Force
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of The Air Force
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department Of Defense
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?