Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Harp v. United States Army Special Operations Command
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Seth Harp
Defendant:
United States Army Special Operations Command
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Harp v. United States Space Force et al
as 1:2022cv00972
Plaintiff:
Seth Harp
Defendant:
United States Space Force, Department of The Air Force and Department Of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Harp v. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
as 1:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Seth Harp
Defendant:
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc. et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2019cv05028
Defendant:
Ben Satterfield, Seth Harp, Anh Lee and others
Plaintiff:
DSCC, Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc. and DCCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
S.P.S., ex rel, et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2019cv04960
Plaintiff:
S.P.S., ex rel., Edwin Prior, DSCC and others
Defendant:
Anh Le, Brad Raffensperger, David Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fair Fight Action et al v. Crittenden et al
as 1:2018cv05391
Defendant:
Ralph F. (Rusty) Simpson, Rebecca N. Sullivan, David J. Worley and others
Plaintiff:
Care in Action and Fair Fight Action
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2018cv04776
Defendant:
Beauty Baldwin, Ralph F. (Rusty) Simpson, Seth Harp and others
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Clark, Jeanne Dufort, Dana Bowers and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Fazal Khan and Carolyn Bourdeaux for Congress
Amicus Curiae:
Campaign Legal Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curling et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2017cv02989
Plaintiff:
Donna Curling , Coalition for Good Governance , Donna Price and others
Defendant:
Brian P. Kemp , David J. Worley , Rebecca N. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
