Bell v. Lumpkin
| Orlando Bell |
| Bobby Lumpkin |
| 1:2023cv00556 |
| May 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Dustin M Howell |
| Robert Pitman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Bobby Lumpkin answer due 7/20/2023. (jv2) |
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Respondent's answer is due on or before July 20, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmj)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer with Brief in Support by Bobby Lumpkin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Dustin M. Howell. (Knowles, Molly) |
| Filing 7 Letter/Correspondence from Orlando Bell. (jv2) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Molly Marie Knowles on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin. Attorney Molly Marie Knowles added to party Bobby Lumpkin(pty:res) (Knowles, Molly) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER for Service of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Orlando Bell and Directing Respondent to Answer. Signed by Judge Dustin M. Howell. (jv2)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Judge Dustin M. Howell. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmj)
|
| Filing 4 Case Opening Letter to Orlando Bell. (cr5) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER (dated 2/21/2020) REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin M. Howell. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. Referral Magistrate Judge: Dustin M. Howell. (cr5)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Orlando Bell. (cr5) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ($ 5 Filing Fee Due), filed by Orlando Bell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Memo in Support, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Exhibit 4, #8 Exhibit 5, #9 Exhibit 6, #10 Exhibit 7, #11 Exhibit 8, #12 Exhibit 9, #13 Envelope)(cr5) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell. (cr5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bell v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Orlando Bell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin | |
| Represented By: | Edward L. Marshall |
| Represented By: | Molly Marie Knowles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
