Williams v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
| Purnell Williams |
| Navy Federal Credit Union, Kim Cogill, Elita Beckwith and Shawn Brooks |
| 1:2023cv01132 |
| September 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Dustin M Howell |
| Robert Pitman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER (dated 02/21/2020) REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin M. Howell. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. Referral Magistrate Judge: Dustin M. Howell. (cr5)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Purnell Williams. (cr5) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (IFP PENDING), filed by Purnell Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit List, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 1a, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Exhibit 3a, #8 Exhibit 4, #9 Exhibit 5, #10 Exhibit 5a, #11 Exhibit 6, #12 Exhibit 7, #13 Exhibit 8, #14 Exhibit 8a, #15 Exhibit 8b)(cr5) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Purnell Williams. (cr5) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell. (cr5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
