Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Simpson v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00396
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Simpson, Tracy Alan Read, Lakeshia Reaggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simpson v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01720
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Simpson, Tracy Alan Read, Lakeshia Reaggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
as 1:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Purnell Williams
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union, Kim Cogill, Elita Beckwith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Scott v. Baltimore County, Maryland
as 23-1731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. SCOTT, RUDOLPH ARMSTRONG, AARON KESSLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND
Brooks v. Keller
as 1:2022cv01233
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brooks
Defendant:
Sgt Keller, Ryan Kuepper and John and/or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Brooks-Tudor v. First Transit, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01534
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brooks-Tudor
Defendant:
First Transit, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Shawn Brooks-Tudor v. First Transit, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv05806
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brooks-Tudor
Defendant:
First Transit, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
BROOKS v. USA
as 1:2021cv00489
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CURTIS SHAWN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BROOKS v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00182
Defendant:
J COKER, MARK INCH, SAILOR and others
Plaintiff:
DA SHAWN BROOKS and DA'SHAUN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
