Griffith v. Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff: Judy Griffith
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company
Case Number: 1:2023cv01258
Filed: October 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David A Ezra
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Katy L. Spencer for the LIMITED PURPOSE of dismissing this lawsuit. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (pg)
December 11, 2023 MOTION REFERRED: referred #8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Katy L. Spencer. Referral Judge: Mark Lane. (pg)
December 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Text Order REFERRING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice to Magistrate Judge Lane. Entered by Judge David A. Ezra. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lc)
December 8, 2023 Filing 11 RESPONSE to #9 Order to Show Cause by Katy L. Spencer (pg)
December 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge David A. Ezra for all proceedings. Judge Robert Pitman no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (bot1)
December 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 12/8/2023. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg)
November 9, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Katy L. Spencer on behalf of Judy Griffith. (Filing Fee Due) (pg)
October 19, 2023 Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to Civil Cover Sheet by Starbucks Corporation. (Corley, Gayla)
October 19, 2023 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Starbucks Corporation (Corley, Gayla)
October 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that the removing party, if it has not already done so, shall within ten (10) days from the date of this order supplement the record with state court pleadings. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (kp)
October 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Directing Blake F. Quackenbush to File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice within 14 days. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (kp)
October 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order Directing Katy L. Spencer to File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice within 14 days. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (kp)
October 19, 2023 Filing 2 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #1 Notice of Removal, this filing is deficient for two reasons: 1) Your Certificate of Service indicates ECF service on attorneys for plaintiffs, who at the time of filing the Notice of Removal had not been added to the docket and therefore has not been served via CM/ECF. Please file an Amended Certificate of Service as a SEPARATE PLEADING. Use the "Certificate of Service" event under the "Service of Process" menu. State alternate means of service to counsel. 2) The Notice of Removal you filed is deficient because you did not attach the Supplement to the Civil Cover Sheet. This form can be located on our website. Please prepare and electronically submit the supplement using Civil Events - Other Filings - Other Documents - Supplement. This form is required for any Notice of Removal filed in the Western District of Texas. (kp)
October 17, 2023 Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kp)
October 17, 2023 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane. (kp)
October 17, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Starbucks Corporation (Filing fee $402 receipt number ATXWDC-17996545), filed by Gayla Corley. (Attachments: #1 Index of Matters Being Filed, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 List of Counsel)(Corley, Gayla) (Attachment 2 replaced on 10/19/2023 to flatten document) (kp). Modified on 10/19/2023 to correct filed by docket text (kp).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Griffith v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Judy Griffith
Represented By: Katy L. Spencer
Represented By: Blake F. Quackenbush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company
Represented By: Gayla S. Corley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?