Cases
Griffith v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2023cv01258
Plaintiff: Judy Griffith
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Griffith v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv14118
Defendant: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Sandoz, Inc., Hospira, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Judy Griffith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02008
Plaintiff: Judy Griffith
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv26024
Plaintiff: Judy Griffith
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bauman et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00224
Plaintiff: Jimmy Bauman , Joyce McCumbers , Lorraine Nichols and others
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Judy Papineau v. Hannah Heilman, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-36176
Plaintiff - Appellee: JUDY GRIFFITH PAPINEAU, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Brooks Papineau
Defendant - Appellant: HANNAH HEILMAN and CITY OF TACOMA
Papineau v. Heilman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv05256
Plaintiff: Judy Griffith Papineau
Defendant: Hannah Heilman , City of Tacoma , John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?